(re)Unions

A few nights ago, I got to talk to Kari on Facebook (sucky sucky sucky chat interface), pretty much for the first time since she departed my place in August. We caught up (sort of, thanks to the interface) and exchanged stories of woe about our current geographical locations. It's no secret I have wanted out of Lafayette pretty much since I moved here--and that my displeasure with my surroundings has affected both my mood and my physical state negatively. Not only am I further behind on paperwork than ever, but I owe Purdue mucho dinero. I am also 18 months away from being without funding, and this has me quite concerned on many fronts. Despite the need to be here, be present, be focused (be filling out paperwork), I've been more and more absent, and we can thank the Interwebs for that.

And on the Interwebs, Kari mentioned missing her high school reunion, for lack of communication. It seems strange to me that a class would hold a reunion in the summer before the 10th anniversary of graduation, but, hey, whatev. My own 10 year reunion will be held sometime this summer, I think, if Mr. Greg Humrichouser manages to get it together. And, I just might go. After all, I may have gained weight since high school, but in general, I've been successful. Ish. I'm not un-successful. Or at least I won't be, if I get the paperwork in.

Of course, all this talk of reunions got me thinking about the cultural purpose of reunions...which for me, begins with the word "reunion" itself. Deconstructionists like "re" words and "de" words because we can play with language--in this case, I think I'd be correctly channeling Derrida if I were to discuss the idea of re-uniting as requiring an idea of original unity, as privileging unity, togetherness, and community identification, which is strange in a late capitalist society.

Oops. Jameson snuck in there. Damn.

The idea of unity, is, of course, highly Platonic in nature. Aristotle (who I know is not Plato, but go with me on this) discussed the Unities of Tragedy--of time, of place, and of plot. To unite means to be one, and yet, the verb implies a process of many "ones" entering into One--many kinds and versions of Human entering into the ideal, complete Form of Humanity. As though we are not whole until we are united, and yet reunion implies that we can, in fact, be separated, be functional, be parts of other unions. Are you ever Not a member once you become one?

On Facebook, I found an old classmate from Ashland Christian School, who is apparently a well-adjusted individual. I wonder, sometimes, what it would be like to hold an ACS reunion--are we still a "class"? A whole unit, working as one in order to...to what? As a functionalist, I look to define things by how they operate, what they do. (That which washes that which we wear). What defines a class as a unit, once that unit has been dispersed? And, as Badiou might ask, who instigates the "count" that calls us to reunite, the count that creates a reunion, that recreates a union? How can there be a State to instigate the count, when that which initiated the original union has since graduated, progressed, moved on, to other counted groups?

I have implied that Greg Hummrichouser is responsible for initiating the (re)count for our class, because we elected him long ago. But the "we" that elected him do not exist again until he calls us into being again--but he cannot call us into being as The State, because we, his constituents do not exist until he calls us.

Here is the problem: Either reunions must call their parts into existence from a sort of nothingness, or that once united, a class is never really disbanded. Sadly, I prefer the first. Because being a member of ACS was bad enough when we were physcially present at the geographical location associated with that organization. My baggage is heavy enough.